1. Factory: Creates objects without specifying th exact class. This pattern makes code flexible and easier to extend, like a factory producing different products.
2. Observer: Enables objects (observers) to watch changes in another object (subject). When the subject changes, observers are notified automatically, like subscribing to updates.
3. Singleton: Ensures a class has only one instance accessible globally, useful for shared resources like databases. Think of it as “the one and only.”
4. Builder: Constructs complex objects step-by-step. Similar to assembling LEGO bricks, this pattern makes it easy to build intricate objects.
5. Adapter: Converts one interface into another expected by clients, making incompatible components work together. It bridges the gap between different interfaces.
6. Decorator: Dynamically adds responsibilities to objects without changing their code. It’s like adding toppings to a pizza, offering a flexible alternative to subclassing.
7. Proxy: Acts as a virtual representative, controlling access to an object and adding functionality, like lazy loading.
8. Strategy: Allows selecting algorithms at runtime, enabling flexible switching of strategies to complete a task. Ideal for situations with multiple ways to achieve a goal.
9. Command: Encapsulates requests as objects, allowing parameterization and queuing, like a to-do list for programs.
10. Template: Defines the structure of an algorithm with overridable steps, useful for reusable workflows.
11. Iterator: Provides a way to access elements of a collection sequentially without exposing its underlying structure, like a “tour guide” for collections.
12. State: Allows an object to change behavior based on its internal state, keeping code organized as different states accumulate. Think of it as a traffic light guiding behavior.

Stateful and Stateless architectures are two approaches to managing user information and data processing in software applications, particularly in web services and APIs.

Stateful Architecture

• Definition: In a stateful architecture, the server retains information (or state) about the client’s session. This state is used to remember previous interactions and respond accordingly in future interactions.
• Characteristics:
  • Session Memory: The server remembers past session data, which influences its responses to future requests.
  • Dependency on Context: The response to a request can depend on previous interactions.
• Example: An online banking application is a typical example of a stateful application. Once you log in, the server maintains your session data (like authentication, your interactions). This data influences how the server responds to your subsequent actions, such as displaying your account balance or transaction history.
• Pros:
  • Personalized Interaction: Enables more personalized user experiences based on previous interactions.
  • Easier to Manage Continuous Transactions: Convenient for transactions that require multiple steps.
• Cons:
  • Resource Intensive: Maintaining state can consume more server resources.
  • Scalability Challenges: Scaling a stateful application can be more complex due to session data dependencies.

Stateless Architecture

• Definition: In a stateless architecture, each request from the client to the server must contain all the information needed to understand and complete the request. The server doesn’t rely on information from previous interactions.
• Characteristics:
  • No Session Memory: The server does not store any state about the client’s session.
  • Self-contained Requests: Each request is independent and must include all necessary data.
• Example: RESTful APIs are a classic example of stateless architecture. Each HTTP request to a RESTful API contains all the information the server needs to process it (like user authentication, required data), and the response to each request doesn’t depend on past requests.
• Pros:
  • Simplicity and Scalability: Easier to scale as there is no need to maintain session state.
  • Predictability: Each request is processed independently, making the system more predictable and easier to debug.
• Cons:
  • Redundancy: Can lead to redundancy in data sent with each request.
  • Potentially More Complex Requests: Clients may need to handle more complexities in preparing requests.

Key Differences

• Session Memory: Stateful retains user session information, influencing future interactions, whereas stateless treats each request as an isolated transaction, independent of previous requests.
• Server Design: Stateful servers maintain state, making them more complex and resource-intensive. Stateless servers are simpler and more scalable.
• Use Cases: Stateful is suitable for applications requiring continuous user interactions and personalization. Stateless is ideal for services where each request can be processed independently, like many web APIs.

Conclusion

Stateful and stateless architectures offer different approaches to handling user sessions and data processing. The choice between them depends on the specific requirements of the application, such as the need for personalization, resource availability, and scalability. Stateful provides a more personalized user experience but at the cost of higher complexity and resource usage, while stateless offers simplicity and scalability, suitable for distributed systems where each request is independent.

Load Balancer and API Gateway are two crucial components in modern web architectures, often used to manage incoming traffic and requests to web applications. While they have some overlapping functionalities, their primary purposes and use cases are distinct.

Load Balancer

• Purpose: A Load Balancer is primarily used to distribute network or application traffic across multiple servers. This distribution helps to optimize resource use, maximize throughput, reduce response time, and ensure reliability.
• How It Works: It accepts incoming requests and then routes them to one of several backend servers based on factors like the number of current connections, server response times, or server health.
• Types: There are different types of load balancers, such as hardware-based or software-based, and they can operate at various layers of the OSI model (Layer 4 – transport level or Layer 7 – application level).

Example of Load Balancer:

Imagine an e-commerce website experiencing high volumes of traffic. A load balancer sits in front of the website’s servers and evenly distributes incoming user requests to prevent any single server from becoming overloaded. This setup increases the website’s capacity and reliability, ensuring all users have a smooth experience.

API Gateway

• Purpose: An API Gateway is an API management tool that sits between a client and a collection of backend services. It acts as a reverse proxy to route requests, simplify the API, and aggregate the results from various services.
• Functionality: The API Gateway can handle a variety of tasks, including request routing, API composition, rate limiting, authentication, and authorization.
• Usage: Commonly used in microservices architectures to provide a unified interface to a set of microservices, making it easier for clients to consume the services.

Example of API Gateway:

Consider a mobile banking application that needs to interact with different services like account details, transaction history, and currency exchange rates. An API Gateway sits between the app and these services. When the app requests user account information, the Gateway routes this request to the appropriate service, handles authentication, aggregates data from different services if needed, and returns a consolidated response to the app.

Key Differences:

• Focus: Load balancers are focused on distributing traffic to prevent overloading servers and ensure high availability and redundancy. API Gateways are more about providing a central point for managing, securing, and routing API calls.
• Functionality: While both can route requests, the API Gateway offers more functionalities like API transformation, composition, and security.

Is it Possible to Use a Load Balancer and an API Gateway Together?

Yes, you can use a Load Balancer and an API Gateway together in a system architecture, and they often complement each other in managing traffic and providing efficient service delivery. The typical arrangement is to place the Load Balancer in front of the API Gateway, but the actual setup can vary based on specific requirements and architecture decisions. Here’s how they can work together:

Load Balancer Before API Gateway

• Most Common Setup: The Load Balancer is placed in front of the API Gateway. This is the typical configuration in many architectures.
• Functionality: The Load Balancer distributes incoming traffic across multiple instances of the API Gateway, ensuring that no single gateway instance becomes a bottleneck.
• Benefits:
  • High Availability: This setup enhances the availability and reliability of the API Gateway.
  • Scalability: Facilitates horizontal scaling of API Gateway instances.
• Example: In a cloud-based microservices architecture, external traffic first hits the Load Balancer, which then routes requests to one of the several API Gateway instances. The chosen API Gateway instance then processes the request, communicates with the appropriate microservices, and returns the response.

Load Balancer After API Gateway

• Alternative Configuration: In some cases, the API Gateway can be placed in front of the Load Balancer, especially when the Load Balancer is used to distribute traffic to various microservices or backend services.
• Functionality: The API Gateway first processes and routes the request to an internal Load Balancer, which then distributes the request to the appropriate service instances.
• Use Case: Useful when different services behind the API Gateway require their own load balancing logic.

Combination of Both

• Hybrid Approach: Some architectures might have Load Balancers at both ends – before and after the API Gateway.
• Reasoning: External traffic is first balanced across API Gateway instances for initial processing (authentication, rate limiting, etc.), and then further balanced among microservices or backend services.

Conclusion:

In a complex web architecture:

• A Load Balancer would be used to distribute incoming traffic across multiple servers or services, enhancing performance and reliability.
• An API Gateway would be the entry point for clients to interact with your backend APIs or microservices, providing a unified interface, handling various cross-cutting concerns, and reducing the complexity for the client applications.

In many real-world architectures, both of these components work together, where the Load Balancer effectively manages traffic across multiple instances of API Gateways or directly to services, depending on the setup.

Latency and throughput are two critical performance metrics in software systems, but they measure different aspects of the system’s performance.

Latency

• Definition: Latency is the time it takes for a piece of data to travel from its source to its destination. In other words, it’s the delay between the initiation of a request and the receipt of the response.
• Characteristics:
  • Measured in units of time (milliseconds, seconds).
  • Lower latency indicates a more responsive system.
• Impact: Latency is particularly important in scenarios where real-time or near-real-time interaction or data transfer is crucial, such as in online gaming, video conferencing, or high-frequency trading.
• Example: If you click a link on a website, the latency would be the time it takes from the moment you click the link to when the page starts loading.

Throughput

• Definition: Throughput refers to the amount of data transferred over a network or processed by a system in a given amount of time. It’s a measure of how much work or data processing is completed over a specific period.
• Characteristics:
  • Measured in units of data per time (e.g., Mbps – Megabits per second).
  • Higher throughput indicates a higher data processing capacity.
• Impact: Throughput is a critical measure in systems where the volume of data processing is significant, such as in data backup systems, bulk data processing, or video streaming services.
• Example: In a video streaming service, throughput would be the rate at which video data is transferred from the server to your device.

Latency vs Throughput – Key Differences

• Focus: Latency is about the delay or time, focusing on speed. Throughput is about the volume of work or data, focusing on capacity.
• Influence on User Experience: High latency can lead to a sluggish user experience, while low throughput can result in slow data transfer rates, affecting the efficiency of data-intensive operations.
• Trade-offs: In some systems, improving throughput may increase latency, and vice versa. For instance, sending data in larger batches may improve throughput but could also result in higher latency.

Improving latency and throughput often involves different strategies, as optimizing for one can sometimes impact the other. However, there are several techniques that can enhance both metrics:

How to Improve Latency

1. Optimize Network Routes: Use Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) to serve content from locations geographically closer to the user. This reduces the distance data must travel, decreasing latency.
2. Upgrade Hardware: Faster processors, more memory, and quicker storage (like SSDs) can reduce processing time.
3. Use Faster Communication Protocols: Protocols like HTTP/2 can reduce latency through features like multiplexing and header compression.
4. Database Optimization: Use indexing, optimized queries, and in-memory databases to reduce data access and processing time.
5. Load Balancing: Distribute incoming requests efficiently among servers to prevent any single server from becoming a bottleneck.
6. Code Optimization: Optimize algorithms and remove unnecessary computations to speed up execution.
7. Minimize External Calls: Reduce the number of API calls or external dependencies in your application.

How to Improve Throughput

1. Scale Horizontally: Add more servers to handle increased load. This is often more effective than vertical scaling (upgrading the capacity of a single server).
2. Implement Caching: Cache frequently accessed data in memory to reduce the need for repeated data processing.
3. Parallel Processing: Use parallel computing techniques where tasks are divided and processed simultaneously.
4. Batch Processing: For non-real-time data, processing in batches can be more efficient than processing each item individually.
5. Optimize Database Performance: Ensure efficient data storage and retrieval. This may include techniques like partitioning and sharding.
6. Asynchronous Processing: Use asynchronous processes for tasks that don’t need to be completed immediately.
7. Network Bandwidth: Increase the network bandwidth to accommodate higher data transfer rates.

Conclusion

Low latency is crucial for applications requiring fast response times, while high throughput is vital for systems dealing with large volumes of data.

Presenting trade-offs in a system design interview is highly significant for several reasons as it demonstrates a depth of understanding and maturity in design. Here’s why discussing trade-offs is important:

1. Shows Comprehensive Understanding

• Balanced Perspective: Discussing trade-offs indicates that you understand there are multiple ways to approach a problem, each with its advantages and disadvantages.
• Depth of Knowledge: It shows that you’re aware of different technologies, architectures, and methodologies, and understand how choices impact a system’s behavior and performance.

2. Highlights Critical Thinking and Decision-Making Skills

• Analytical Approach: By evaluating trade-offs, you demonstrate an ability to analyze various aspects of a system, considering factors like scalability, performance, maintainability, and cost.
• Informed Decision-Making: It shows that your design decisions are thoughtful and informed, rather than arbitrary.

3. Demonstrates Real-World Problem-Solving Skills

• Practical Solutions: In the real world, every system design decision comes with trade-offs. Demonstrating this understanding aligns with practical, real-world scenarios where perfect solutions rarely exist.
• Prioritization: Discussing trade-offs shows that you can prioritize certain aspects over others based on the requirements and constraints, which is a critical skill in system design.

4. Reveals Awareness of Business and Technical Constraints

• Business Acumen: Understanding trade-offs indicates that you’re considering not just the technical but also the business implications of your design choices (like cost implications, time to market).
• Adaptability: It shows you can adapt your design to meet different priorities and constraints, which is key in a dynamic business environment.

5. Facilitates Better Team Collaboration and Communication

• Communication Skills: Clearly articulating trade-offs is a vital part of effective technical communication, crucial for collaborating with team members and stakeholders.
• Expectation Management: It helps in setting realistic expectations and preparing for potential challenges in implementation.

6. Prepares for Scalability and Future Growth

• Long-term Vision: Discussing trade-offs shows that you’re thinking about how the system will evolve over time and how early decisions might impact future changes or scalability.

7. Shows Maturity and Experience

• Professional Maturity: Recognizing that every decision has pros and cons reflects professional maturity and experience in handling complex projects.
• Learning from Experience: It can also indicate that you’ve learned from past experiences, applying these lessons to make better design choices.

Conclusion

In system design interviews, discussing trade-offs is not just about acknowledging that they exist, but about demonstrating a well-rounded and mature approach to system design. It reflects a candidate’s ability to make informed decisions, a deep understanding of technical principles, and an appreciation of the broader business context.

Up next, let’s discuss some essential trade-offs that you can explore during a system design interview.

REST (Representational State Transfer) and RPC (Remote Procedure Call) are two architectural approaches used for designing networked applications, particularly for web services and APIs. Each has its distinct style and is suited for different use cases.

REST (Representational State Transfer)

• Concept: REST is an architectural style that uses HTTP requests to access and manipulate data. It treats server data as resources that can be created, read, updated, or deleted (CRUD operations) using standard HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE).
• Stateless: Each request from client to server must contain all the necessary information to understand and complete the request. The server does not store any client context between requests.
• Data and Resources: Emphasizes on resources, identified by URLs, and their state transferred over HTTP in a textual representation like JSON or XML.
• Example: A RESTful web service for a blog might provide a URL like http://example.com/articles for accessing articles. A GET request to that URL would retrieve articles, and a POST request would create a new article.

Advantages of REST

• Scalability: Stateless interactions improve scalability and visibility.
• Performance: Can leverage HTTP caching infrastructure.
• Simplicity and Flexibility: Uses standard HTTP methods, making it easy to understand and implement.

Disadvantages of REST

• Over-fetching or Under-fetching: Sometimes, it retrieves more or less data than needed.
• Standardization: Lacks a strict standard, leading to different interpretations and implementations.

RPC (Remote Procedure Call)

• Concept: RPC is a protocol that allows one program to execute a procedure (subroutine) in another address space (commonly on another computer on a shared network). The programmer defines specific procedures.
• Procedure-Oriented: Clients and servers communicate with each other through explicit remote procedure calls. The client invokes a remote method, and the server returns the results of the executed procedure.
• Data Transmission: Can use various formats like JSON (JSON-RPC) or XML (XML-RPC), or binary formats like Protocol Buffers (gRPC).
• Example: A client invoking a method getArticle(articleId) on a remote server. The server executes the method and returns the article’s details to the client.

Advantages of RPC

• Tight Coupling: Allows for a more straightforward mapping of actions (procedures) to server-side operations.
• Efficiency: Binary RPC (like gRPC) can be more efficient in data transfer and faster in performance.
• Clear Contract: Procedure definitions create a clear contract between the client and server.

Disadvantages of RPC

• Less Flexible: Tightly coupled to the methods defined on the server.
• Stateful Interactions: Can maintain state, which might reduce scalability.

Conclusion

• REST is generally more suited for web services and public APIs where scalability, caching, and a uniform interface are important.
• RPC is often chosen for actions that are tightly coupled to server-side operations, especially when efficiency and speed are critical, as in internal microservices communication.

As a system designer, one of the most important decisions you have to make is choosing the right architecture and design patterns for your system. Different patterns serve different purposes, and selecting the right one can greatly impact the performance, scalability, and maintainability of your system.

In this post, we will explore the top 10 system design patterns and when to use them. This list is not exhaustive, and there are many other patterns that you can use depending on your specific requirements and goals. However, these patterns are among the most commonly used and widely applicable, and they can serve as a useful starting point for your own design decisions.

Client-server:

The client-server pattern is a common architecture for distributed systems, where clients send requests to a server and the server responds with the requested data or services. This pattern is used in many web and mobile applications, where the client (e.g. a web browser or a mobile app) sends requests to a server (e.g. a web server or an API server) and the server provides the data or functionality.

Microservices:

The microservices pattern is a variation of the client-server pattern, where a system is composed of multiple, independent services that communicate with each other through well-defined interfaces. This pattern allows for greater modularity, flexibility, and scalability, and it is often used in large, complex systems where a monolithic architecture would be difficult to maintain and evolve.

Pipeline:

The pipeline pattern is a design pattern for data processing systems, where data is passed through a series of stages or steps, each of which performs a specific transformation or operation on the data. This pattern is used in many ETL (extract, transform, load) systems, where data is extracted from multiple sources, transformed into a common format, and loaded into a target data store.

Publish-subscribe:

The publish-subscribe pattern is a communication pattern for decoupling producers and consumers of data or events. In this pattern, producers send data or events to a message broker, and consumers subscribe to the data or events that they are interested in. This pattern is used in many distributed systems and messaging systems, where it enables asynchronous communication and scalability.

Load balancer:

The load balancer pattern is a design pattern for distributing workloads across multiple servers or instances. In this pattern, a load balancer receives incoming requests and routes them to one of the servers or instances based on various criteria, such as the availability of the servers or the workload they are handling. This pattern is used in many scalable, highly-available systems, where it helps to distribute the workload evenly and avoid overloading any single server or instance.

Caching:

The caching pattern is a design pattern for improving the performance of a system by storing frequently-used data in memory or a fast storage medium. In this pattern, data that is accessed frequently or has a high latency when retrieved from the primary data store is stored in the cache, where it can be accessed more quickly and efficiently. This pattern is used in many systems that require low-latency access to data, such as web applications or real-time data processing systems.

Sharding:

The sharding pattern is a design pattern for partitioning a large dataset or workload across multiple servers or instances. In this pattern, the data or workload is divided into smaller units called shards, which are distributed across the servers or instances. This pattern is used in many systems that have to handle large amounts of data or handle a high volume of requests, where a single server or instance would not be able to handle the workload efficiently.

Event sourcing:

The event sourcing pattern is a design pattern for storing and managing data in a system. In this pattern, data is stored as a sequence of events or changes, rather than the current state of the data. This pattern is used in many systems that need to maintain a history of changes or provide auditing or undo/redo functionality, such as financial systems or content management systems.

Command query responsibility segregation (CQRS):

The CQRS pattern is a design pattern for separating the read and write operations in a system. In this pattern, the system is divided into two parts: the command side, which handles write operations, and the query side, which handles read operations. This pattern is used in many systems that have high read-and-write ratios, or where the read-and-write operations have different performance or consistency requirements, such as e-commerce or social networking systems.

Materialized views:

The materialized views pattern is a design pattern for optimizing the performance of read operations in a system. In this pattern, pre-computed, denormalized views of the data are stored in a separate data store, and the system retrieves the data from the materialized views rather than computing it on the fly. This pattern is used in many systems that have complex or expensive read queries, or where the data is frequently accessed or updated, such as data warehousing or analytics systems.

These are some of the most commonly used and widely applicable system design patterns. You can use them as a starting point for your own design decisions, and you can also combine or adapt them to fit the specific requirements and goals of your system. It’s important to remember that there is no one-size-fits-all solution, and the right pattern for your system will depend on your specific needs and constraints.

O que é TOGAF®?

TOGAF®—The Open Group Architectural Framework é uma das estruturas de arquitetura empresarial para melhorar a eficiência empresarial. A estrutura ajuda as empresas a definir suas metas e alinhá-las com os objetivos de arquitetura em torno do desenvolvimento de software empresarial.

O TOGAF® tem sido usado por arquitetos corporativos (EAs) como uma linguagem comum para traçar estratégias de desenvolvimento de TI por mais de 25 anos. Ele foi desenvolvido em 1995 para ajudar empresas e arquitetos corporativos a se alinharem em projetos interdepartamentais de forma estruturada para facilitar os principais objetivos de negócios.

Em particular, de acordo com o Open Group Architectural Forum, o objetivo fundamental do TOGAF® é dar suporte às necessidades críticas dos negócios por meio de:

• Garantir que todos falem a mesma língua.
• Evitando a dependência de soluções proprietárias padronizando métodos abertos para arquitetura empresarial.
• Economizando tempo e dinheiro e utilizando recursos de forma mais eficaz.
• Alcançando ROI demonstrável.

E para garantir que o acima seja implementado de forma sistemática e repetível, um processo personalizável chamado Método de Desenvolvimento Arquitetônico (ADM) TOGAF® pode ser seguido em vários estágios para gerenciar os requisitos de qualquer empreendimento de modernização de TI em larga escala.

Em 2022, o The Open Group atualizou a estrutura e lançou o TOGAF Standard, 10ª edição, que substitui a edição 9.2 anterior. A atualização torna a adoção mais fácil para as organizações implementarem as melhores práticas do TOGAF. O The Open Group afirma que a 10ª edição fornece eficiência aprimorada e navegação mais simples para implementar a estrutura, tornando-a mais acessível e amigável.

Os quatro domínios arquitetônicos do TOGAF

O processo ADM do TOGAF® foi projetado especificamente para acelerar o fluxo de trabalho em quatro domínios da arquitetura empresarial:

1. Arquitetura de negócios
   Responsável por mapear os relacionamentos entre as hierarquias operacionais, políticas, capacidades e iniciativas de uma empresa.
2. Arquitetura de aplicativos
   Responsável por definir aplicativos relevantes para lidar com dados da empresa e as maneiras de implementar e implantar esses aplicativos na infraestrutura geral.
3. Arquitetura de dados
   Responsável por definir as regras e padrões para armazenar e integrar dados.
4. Arquitetura técnica
   Define plataformas, serviços e todos os componentes tecnológicos circundantes para servir como referência para equipes de desenvolvimento.

O Modelo de Desenvolvimento de Arquitetura TOGAF (ADM)

A estrutura TOGAF não apenas descreve os principais componentes de uma Arquitetura Empresarial por meio de seus quatro Domínios Arquitetônicos, mas também fornece um roteiro claro sobre como criar essa arquitetura. Esse roteiro é conhecido como Método de Desenvolvimento de Arquitetura (ADM) e é um processo sequencial de nove fases. O ADM orienta as organizações no desenvolvimento de sua Arquitetura Empresarial e é descrito na Figura 1.

Ao longo dos nove estágios do processo TOGAF® ADM, esses quatro domínios arquitetônicos se tornam iterativamente desenvolvidos para criar uma arquitetura equilibrada capaz de garantir mudanças organizacionais. Um processo independente do setor, esse método tem como objetivo limitar a adivinhação e promover a maturidade em programas de arquitetura empresarial — tudo isso enquanto acumula repositórios arquitetônicos específicos da empresa para dar suporte a projetos futuros.

Quais são os desafios do TOGAF® em ambientes de TI modernos?

O TOGAF® está atualmente na versão 10, e com sua biblioteca em evolução de definições e simbologia vem a luta inevitável para se alinhar à estrutura de forma ágil. Muito disso se deve ao processo abrangente de revisão de conformidade arquitetônica do TOGAF®, uma lista de verificação envolvendo centenas de itens de categorias como gerenciamento de informações e sistemas; hardware e sistemas operacionais; serviços de software e middleware; aplicativos (especificações de negócios, infraestrutura e integração); e gerenciamento de informações.

No entanto, embora a conformidade seja um elemento indispensável da governança arquitetônica, aderir religiosamente aos padrões da estrutura é uma tarefa difícil para qualquer programa de arquitetura empresarial . Como tal, para organizações modernas que desejam manter eficientemente as melhores práticas do TOGAF®, é quase necessário obter a participação das partes interessadas em toda a organização para avaliar e catalogar eficientemente os projetos de TI.

Agile e TOGAF® são de fato capazes de coexistir, mas para que isso aconteça, caminhos colaborativos para padronizar entidades de TI entre equipes devem ser estabelecidos.

O que há de novo no TOGAF® 10?

A 10ª edição do TOGAF apresenta um novo formato modular que traz vários benefícios. O ramo Conteúdo Fundamental inclui todos os fundamentos da estrutura, tornando mais fácil para as empresas começarem a implementar e aprender o TOGAF. Esta parte da estrutura é a menos provável de mudar significativamente ao longo do tempo . A estrutura modular fornece aos arquitetos corporativos melhor orientação e um processo de navegação mais simples, permitindo que eles usem a estrutura de forma eficaz. A base de conhecimento e a orientação específica do tópico são separadas em partes formais da estrutura, tornando possíveis lançamentos frequentes de material adicional, preservando a estabilidade no conteúdo fundamental.

Além disso, a 10ª edição do TOGAF continua a aprimorar sua capacidade de dar suporte aos aspectos fundamentais da estratégia de negócios, tornando mais útil para os fornecedores fornecer novos recursos e serviços para segmentos de mercado especializados, ao mesmo tempo em que aderem a padrões abertos. A estrutura é projetada para se adaptar às necessidades de negócios em mudança e é um corpo vivo de conhecimento, permitindo que as organizações estabeleçam formas ágeis de trabalho que evoluem continuamente. A 10ª edição do TOGAF demonstra como a estrutura está evoluindo para fornecer valor em tempos de mudança.

Brasil

Glassdoor